As usual, I was trying to zero in on a topic that would be my next piece in this blog. The choices ranged from a simple documentary of one of my experiences to an emotional retort upon the peshawar attack. My flatmate laughed off at my latter choice. So I chose the happening topic-resolutions on new year's eve, to begin with.
We are at the beginning of another year and it is time for those long list of resolutions that are forgotten in less than a fortnight. One of the common ironical resolutions is pledging to quit drinking while taking a shot on New year's eve. The reason is logical too, "its my last shot, before I quit" except that it is not as one can't be expected to pledge other resolutions without a shot each :P.
I am no exception but on this day, I would like to ponder upon a thought that has been growing within since the last few days, the politics on social divisions.
The recently concluded elections in Jharkhand resulted in a non-tribal chief minister for a tribal majority state and the winning party is the one accused of being communal. Many adversaries of the same accused it of playing divisive and communal politics by placing a non-tribal at top and many more learned folks have shared their opinion through various media. This is just my interpretation and understanding of the same with the preconceived notions that I have developed throughout my life.
Not just because I used to admire the leadership of the winning party but I can't digest the irony in opponents claiming it to be communal for placing a non-tribal as the head of a state. As for as I know, there is no say in the constitution that states the head of a region should be from the majority caste, then how is it communal or against the minority in a person from minority wielding power. This is another irony in this entire political game of our country. Many an organisations that claim to support the minorities actually raise their voice in places where the 'minorities' are actually the majority in that region and are economically weak as well, for that is the demographic that exercises the fundamental right of casting their votes, probably because that is their only right that hasn't been exploited, well atleast not denied.
One thing I am happy and proud of being a Tamilian is the fact that the then leaders of the Dravidian movement took steps to eliminate the significance of castes by advocating the exclusion of surnames that reflect the lineage. Wish more was done in that front before they got fixated on political gains and started vote bank politics, another feature left behind by the British ideology of divide and rule.
Although we claim to be a secular nation with no disparity on the basis of caste or creed, it is one of the first things asked in our life right from kindergarten to college and at every scratch with the government proceedings. That's an irony we have grown accustomed to since we are toddlers. Well, I guess even a 100 'PK's on caste (instead of religion) wouldn't help the next lot escape from these questions, if we don't resolute to avoid asking or answering these and doom the political masters who try to pull out this wildcard whenever they require.
I guess, that makes for one solid resolution this year. Happy new year folks.! Have a great year ahead..:)